Dates are calculated as the UTC date. The “raw date” from the email dump is included in brackets. The date may be inconsistent with the raw date because of the time difference with UTC time.

Ordering by UTC time ensures true chronological ordering.

Threads

Re: Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal

  • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 16:39:37 PST) – Re: Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal – jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)
    • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 19:07:06 PST) – Re: Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
    • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 02:44:11 PST) – Remailer Scripting Languages – tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)

Re: “bad” government

  • 1995-01-31 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 10:28:43 PST) – Re: “bad” government – alt@iquest.net (Al Thompson)
    • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 17:50:32 PST) – Re: “bad” government – Charles Bell <quester@eskimo.com>

Re: Z-Mail

  • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 17:51:00 PST) – Re: Z-Mail – Chris Claborne <Chris.Claborne@SanDiego.ATTGIS.COM>

Re: AT&T and VLSI Encryption device

  • 1995-01-31 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 11:02:57 PST) – Re: AT&T and VLSI Encryption device – Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>
    • 1995-01-31 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 11:11:38 PST) – Re: AT&T and VLSI Encryption device – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
      • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 17:53:54 PST) – Re: AT&T and VLSI Encryption device – Charles Bell <quester@eskimo.com>
        • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 18:07:20 PST) – Re: AT&T and VLSI Encryption device – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>

CD-ROM [brief addition]

  • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 18:27:47 PST) – CD-ROM [brief addition] – sameer <sameer@c2.org>
    • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 22:33:39 PST) – Re: CD-ROM [brief addition] – Dave Horsfall <dave@esi.COM.AU>

Re: Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal

  • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 18:57:30 PST) – Re: Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal – cactus@seabsd.hks.net (Todd Masco)
    • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 21:21:38 PST) – Re: Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)

cel fraud

  • 1995-01-07 (Sat, 7 Jan 95 10:55:27 PST) – cel fraud – an172607@anon.penet.fi (duquesne duke)
    • 1995-01-07 (Sat, 7 Jan 95 11:54:26 PST) – Re: cel fraud – roy@cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
    • 1995-01-22 (Sun, 22 Jan 95 00:37:00 PST) – Re: cel fraud – Arsen Ray Arachelian <rarachel@prism.poly.edu>
      • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 19:13:11 PST) – Re: cel fraud – Christopher E Stefan <flatline@u.washington.edu>

Z-Mail by Web

  • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 19:24:05 PST) – Z-Mail by Web – jltocher@earthlink.net (John L. Tocher)

remailers and multiple recipients

  • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 19:25:26 PST) – remailers and multiple recipients – jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)

VoicePGP cracked in 10 minutes?…

  • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 19:56:07 PST) – VoicePGP cracked in 10 minutes?… – root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
    • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 20:31:13 PST) – Re: VoicePGP cracked in 10 minutes?… – Michael Handler <grendel@netaxs.com>
    • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 06:18:28 PST) – Re: VoicePGP cracked in 10 minutes?… – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
    • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 09:53:27 PST) – Re: VoicePGP cracked in 10 minutes?… – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>

Re: remailers and multiple recipients

  • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 20:12:54 PST) – Re: remailers and multiple recipients – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

The RSA FAQ on http://www.catalog.com/jamesd/rsafaq.html

  • 1995-01-31 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 00:43:09 PST) – The RSA FAQ on http://www.catalog.com/jamesd/rsafaq.html – jamesd@netcom.com
    • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 20:35:51 PST) – Re: The RSA FAQ on http://www.catalog.com/jamesd/rsafaq.html – Michael Handler <grendel@netaxs.com>

DON’T READ!–I’m leaving for Monte Carlo just in time

  • 1995-01-30 (Mon, 30 Jan 95 12:33:02 PST) – DON’T READ!–I’m leaving for Monte Carlo just in time – tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
    • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 20:39:32 PST) – Re: DON’T READ!–I’m leaving for Monte Carlo just in time – storm@marlin.ssnet.com (Don Melvin)
      • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 21:32:51 PST) – Re: DON’T READ!–I’m leaving for Monte Carlo just in time – Joe Turner <turner@telecheck.com>

Where is the Line Between Public and Private Data?

  • 1995-01-30 (Mon, 30 Jan 95 13:00:19 PST) – Where is the Line Between Public and Private Data? – Joe Turner <turner@telecheck.com>
    • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 20:40:14 PST) – Re: Where is the Line Between Public and Private Data? – storm@marlin.ssnet.com (Don Melvin)

Re: Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal

  • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 20:53:20 PST) – Re: Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software

  • 1995-01-30 (Mon, 30 Jan 95 08:01:55 PST) – ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software – Matt Blaze <mab@research.att.com>
    • 1995-01-30 (Mon, 30 Jan 95 09:06:17 PST) – Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software – Alan Barrett <barrett@daisy.ee.und.ac.za>
    • 1995-01-30 (Mon, 30 Jan 95 09:42:48 PST) – Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software – Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
      • 1995-01-30 (Mon, 30 Jan 95 10:07:52 PST) – Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software – Matt Blaze <mab@research.att.com>
        • 1995-01-30 (Mon, 30 Jan 95 11:23:32 PST) – Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software – Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
          • 1995-01-30 (Mon, 30 Jan 95 13:05:57 PST) – Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
            • 1995-01-31 (Mon, 30 Jan 95 23:56:13 PST) – Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software – Alan Barrett <barrett@daisy.ee.und.ac.za>
        • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 21:29:07 PST) – Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
          • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 23:49:33 PST) – Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software – Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
            • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 08:58:07 PST) – Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)

Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software

  • 1995-01-31 (Mon, 30 Jan 95 20:47:36 PST) – Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software – norm@netcom.com (Norman Hardy)
    • 1995-01-31 (Mon, 30 Jan 95 21:48:38 PST) – Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software – Matt Blaze <mab@research.att.com>
      • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 22:08:49 PST) – The security characteristics of crypto modules with secrets – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
        • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 00:11:56 PST) – Re: The security characteristics of crypto modules with secrets – “James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>
          • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 07:27:03 PST) – Re: The security characteristics of crypto modules with secrets – Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
            • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 08:54:28 PST) – Re: The security characteristics of crypto modules with secrets – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
            • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 10:59:25 PST) – Re: The security characteristics of crypto modules withsecrets – A5113643667@attpls.net (Tom Jones)

How the cypherpunks nearly got me fired (long)

  • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 22:10:16 PST) – How the cypherpunks nearly got me fired (long) – dmandl@panix.com (David Mandl)

Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software

  • 1995-01-31 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 15:37:57 PST) – Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software – Matt Blaze <mab@research.att.com>
    • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 22:37:21 PST) – Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software – erc@s116.slcslip.indirect.com (Ed Carp [khijol Sysadmin])

Scientology Petition v2.1

  • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 23:04:04 PST) – Scientology Petition v2.1 – Homer Wilson Smith <homer@math.cornell.edu>

Re: How the cypherpunks nearly got me fired (long)

  • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 23:37:36 PST) – Re: How the cypherpunks nearly got me fired (long) – Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>
    • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 06:35:42 PST) – Re: How the cypherpunks nearly got me fired (long) – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
      • 1995-02-04 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 14:31:31 PST) – Re: How the cypherpunks nearly got me fired (long) – sdw@lig.net (Stephen D. Williams)
        • 1995-02-05 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 13:16:45 PST) – Re: How the cypherpunks nearly got me fired (long) – Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>

ESM

  • 1995-02-01 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 23:45:14 PST) – ESM – Mark Rogaski <rogaski@phobos.lib.iup.edu>

Minnesota Cypherpunks Get Together and Bull Session

  • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 00:45:08 PST) – Minnesota Cypherpunks Get Together and Bull Session – skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)

Re: CD-ROM [brief addition]

  • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 01:18:54 PST) – Re: CD-ROM [brief addition] – danisch@ira.uka.de (Hadmut Danisch)

Surety (authentication)

  • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 01:27:27 PST) – Surety (authentication) – hkhenson@cup.portal.com

A proposal….

  • Unknown thread root
    • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 04:23:52 PST) – A proposal…. – Homer Wilson Smith <homer@math.cornell.edu>

Re: CD-ROM [brief addition]

  • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 05:18:47 PST) – Re: CD-ROM [brief addition] – Alex de Joode <usura@replay.com>

PGP Question

  • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 05:56:14 PST) – PGP Question – danisch@ira.uka.de (Hadmut Danisch)
    • 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 16:53:34 PST) – Re: PGP Question – Derek Atkins <warlord@ATHENA.MIT.EDU>

Re: CD-ROM [brief addition]

  • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 05:56:47 PST) – Re: CD-ROM [brief addition] – danisch@ira.uka.de (Hadmut Danisch)

your membership renewal letter

  • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 07:38:08 PST) – your membership renewal letter – ssteele@eff.org (Shari Steele)

Mystery files in the incoming/ directory

  • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 08:36:15 PST) – Mystery files in the incoming/ directory – Eric Hughes <hughes@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>

Re: “bad” government

  • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 09:43:00 PST) – Re: “bad” government – alt@iquest.net (Al Thompson)
    • 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 17:00:14 PST) – Re: “bad” government – Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>

What’s with anon.penet.fi??

  • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 09:58:08 PST) – What’s with anon.penet.fi?? – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>

Fundamental Question?

  • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 10:54:36 PST) – Fundamental Question? – Anthony Ortenzi <ortenzi@interactive.net>
    • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 11:12:48 PST) – Re: Fundamental Question? – Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
    • 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 20:00:37 PST) – Re: Fundamental Question? – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
      • 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 20:48:07 PST) – Re: Fundamental Question? – Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
      • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 10:18:38 PST) – Re: Fundamental Question? – Anthony Ortenzi <ortenzi@interactive.net>

Re: Fundamental Question?

  • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 11:28:22 PST) – Re: Fundamental Question? – Andrew Lowenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>

Clipper Revived?

  • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 11:31:47 PST) – Clipper Revived? – jltocher@CCGATE.HAC.COM
    • 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 20:35:08 PST) – Re: Clipper Revived? – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>

Re: Fundamental Question?

  • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 12:11:00 PST) – Re: Fundamental Question? – cactus@seabsd.hks.net (Todd Masco)

Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software

  • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 13:03:39 PST) – Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software – norm@netcom.com (Norman Hardy)
    • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 13:37:44 PST) – Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software – Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>

FMP

  • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 13:47:13 PST) – FMP – Todd Masco <cactus@hks.net>

Re: Fundamental Question?

  • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 15:23:59 PST) – Re: Fundamental Question? – kevin@elvis.wicat.com

Re: Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal

  • 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 15:48:30 PST) – Re: Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal – kevin@elvis.wicat.com

Re: Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal

  • 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 16:17:20 PST) – Re: Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal – kevin@elvis.wicat.com

Re: Fundamental Question?

  • 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 16:29:32 PST) – Re: Fundamental Question? – cactus@seabsd.hks.net (Todd Masco)

Lucky primes & omlets on my face…

  • 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 16:58:23 PST) – Lucky primes & omlets on my face… – Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.

  • 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 16:59:39 PST) – Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet. – Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
    • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 06:45:22 PST) – Remailer encryption module – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
      • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 06:53:24 PST) – Re: Remailer encryption module – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
        • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 08:48:23 PST) – Re: Remailer encryption module – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
          • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 08:53:15 PST) – Re: Remailer encryption module – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
      • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 07:08:49 PST) – Re: Remailer encryption module – Allan Bailey <allan@elvis.tamu.edu>
        • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 15:44:26 PST) – Re: Remailer encryption module – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
      • 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 17:23:58 PST) – Re: Remailer encryption module – Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
        • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 11:52:36 PST) – Re: Remailer encryption module – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
    • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 08:36:40 PST) – Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet. – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)

Ending the Crusade

  • 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 17:00:02 PST) – Ending the Crusade – Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
    • 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 18:21:10 PST) – Re: Ending the Crusade – Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>

Thanks for not flaming !??!?

  • 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 17:00:35 PST) – Thanks for not flaming !??!? – Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Re: Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal

  • 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 17:00:38 PST) – Re: Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal – kevin@elvis.wicat.com

Re: Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal

  • 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 17:03:28 PST) – Re: Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal – cactus@seabsd.hks.net (Todd Masco)

Re: Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal

  • 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 17:18:11 PST) – Re: Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal – kevin@elvis.wicat.com

NYC area C’Punks meet 2/11/95

  • 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 17:57:46 PST) – NYC area C’Punks meet 2/11/95 – mjwohler@netcom.com (Marc Wohler)

Re: Lucky primes & omlets on my face…

  • 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 18:13:38 PST) – Re: Lucky primes & omlets on my face… – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
    • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 13:58:56 PST) – Re: Lucky primes & omlets on my face… – chen@intuit.com (Mark Chen)

Frothing remailers, the advertising and pinging problems

  • 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 18:19:09 PST) – Frothing remailers, the advertising and pinging problems – jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)

No Subject

  • 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 19:08:30 PST) – No Subject – <remail@desert.xs4all.nl>

Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.

  • 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 23:14:37 PST) – Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet. – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

computer underground digest stuff

  • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 05:46:08 PST) – computer underground digest stuff – an158409@anon.penet.fi (beacher)

Frothing remailers and trust

  • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 06:09:53 PST) – Frothing remailers and trust – Greg Broiles <greg@ideath.goldenbear.com>

How much entropy in a key press?

  • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 07:04:00 PST) – How much entropy in a key press? – Nobody@eniac.ac.siue.edu (Anonymous)
    • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 08:37:22 PST) – Re: How much entropy in a key press? – Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
    • 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 18:26:52 PST) – Re: How much entropy in a key press? – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>

Video encryption & QTC

  • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 08:18:34 PST) – Video encryption & QTC – paul@poboy.b17c.ingr.com (Paul Robichaux)

Adding padding to PGP files

  • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 08:49:39 PST) – Adding padding to PGP files – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
    • 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 20:47:02 PST) – Re: Adding padding to PGP files – Nobody@eniac.ac.siue.edu (Anonymous)
      • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 00:20:26 PST) – Re: Adding padding to PGP files – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>

Re: Frothing remailers, the advertising and pinging problems

  • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 09:23:33 PST) – Re: Frothing remailers, the advertising and pinging problems – xpat%vm1.spcs.uma.thurman.edu@vm1.spcs.umn.edu

Re: Remailer encryption module

  • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 09:46:29 PST) – Re: Remailer encryption module – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

info

  • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 13:27:56 PST) – info – Luis Agustin Perez <lperez@oswego.Oswego.EDU>

MX’ing and jpunix.com

  • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 13:29:14 PST) – MX’ing and jpunix.com – “John A. Perry” <perry@jpunix.com>
    • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 15:14:54 PST) – Re: MX’ing and jpunix.com – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)

nullWhat’s Killing My Remailed Posts?

  • 1995-01-31 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 01:56:20 PST) – nullWhat’s Killing My Remailed Posts? – nobody@rebma.rebma.mn.org
    • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 14:11:13 PST) – Re: null – Matthew J Ghio <mg5n+@andrew.cmu.edu>

Remailer Unreliability

  • 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 14:56:26 PST) – Remailer Unreliability – nobody@myriad.pc.cc.cmu.edu (Anonymous)
    • 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 18:36:54 PST) – Re: Remailer Unreliability – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
    • 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 19:01:25 PST) – Re: Remailer Unreliability – anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com

The FIREWALL CHIP. U’re phone always offhook?

  • 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 16:01:21 PST) – The FIREWALL CHIP. U’re phone always offhook? – “Gary Jeffers” <CCGARY@MIZZOU1.missouri.edu>
    • 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 18:04:17 PST) – Re: The FIREWALL CHIP. U’re phone always offhook? – SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>
    • 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 23:01:25 PST) – Re: The FIREWALL CHIP. U’re phone always offhook? – Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>

Remailing in safe-tcl

  • 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 16:15:01 PST) – Remailing in safe-tcl – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.

  • 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 18:01:19 PST) – Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet. – Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
    • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 07:16:12 PST) – Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet. – nobody@tower.techwood.org (Anonymous)

Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal

  • 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 18:03:03 PST) – Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal – Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

The FNORDWALL CHIP.

  • 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 18:12:33 PST) – The FNORDWALL CHIP. – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>

Re: Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal

  • 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 18:26:30 PST) – Re: Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

1995-02-02 President Names Members to Intelligence Commission (fwd)

  • 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 20:16:54 PST) – 1995-02-02 President Names Members to Intelligence Commission (fwd) – Anthony Ortenzi <ortenzi@interactive.net>

Re: The FIREWALL CHIP. U’re phone always offhook?

  • 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 20:44:04 PST) – Re: The FIREWALL CHIP. U’re phone always offhook? – daleh@ix.netcom.com (Dale Harrison (AEGIS))
    • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 10:46:48 PST) – Re: The FIREWALL CHIP. U’re phone always offhook? – Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
      • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 14:00:10 PST) – Re: The FIREWALL CHIP. U’re phone always offhook? – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>

Re: Remailer Unreliability

  • 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 21:11:34 PST) – Re: Remailer Unreliability – jordyn@alinc.com (Jordyn A Buchanan)

Re: Adding padding to PGP files

  • 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 21:15:55 PST) – Re: Adding padding to PGP files – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

Re: Remailer Unreliability

  • 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 21:16:56 PST) – Re: Remailer Unreliability – jordyn@alinc.com (Jordyn A Buchanan)

A simple idea

  • 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 22:31:34 PST) – A simple idea – Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>

Re: Remailing in safe-tcl

  • Unknown thread root
    • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 07:26:27 PST) – Re: Remailing in safe-tcl – Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>

Re: Remailer Unreliability

  • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 08:50:25 PST) – Re: Remailer Unreliability – nobody@myriad.pc.cc.cmu.edu (Anonymous)

No Subject

  • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 09:12:52 PST) – No Subject – jltocher@CCGATE.HAC.COM

to hfinney

  • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 09:15:23 PST) – to hfinney – anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com

Re: THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS

  • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 09:28:27 PST) – Re: THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS – peb@netcom.com (Paul E. Baclace)
    • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 10:24:21 PST) – Re: THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS – Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>

Tribes, cyberspace and the communication society

  • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 09:54:26 PST) – Tribes, cyberspace and the communication society – rishab@dxm.ernet.in

Compromising the first remailer

  • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 09:56:58 PST) – Compromising the first remailer – rishab@dxm.ernet.in

Re: 1995-02-02 President Names Members to Intelligence Commissi

  • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 10:02:45 PST) – Re: 1995-02-02 President Names Members to Intelligence Commissi – “Brett Turcotte” <turcotte@io.com>

Re: to hfinney

  • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 10:33:32 PST) – Re: to hfinney – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

Mugshot Identification Database announcement

  • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 11:17:35 PST) – Mugshot Identification Database announcement – Technoshaman Tom <tedwards@wam.umd.edu>

re to hfinney

  • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 11:42:27 PST) – re to hfinney – anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
    • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 13:42:54 PST) – Re: re to hfinney – Joe Turner <turner@telecheck.com>
      • 1995-02-04 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 11:19:53 PST) – Re: re to hfinney – roy@cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)

Re: Compromising the first remailer

  • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 11:42:44 PST) – Re: Compromising the first remailer – jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)

NYT on Jihad

  • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 13:12:51 PST) – NYT on Jihad – John Young <jya@pipeline.com>

Remailer Unreliability

  • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 14:29:55 PST) – Remailer Unreliability – Greg Broiles <greg@ideath.goldenbear.com>

Re: VoicePGP cracked in 10 minutes?…

  • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 15:16:13 PST) – Re: VoicePGP cracked in 10 minutes?… – wcs@anchor.ho.att.com

Re: Is the remailer crisis over?

  • 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 15:24:04 PST) – Re: Is the remailer crisis over? – wcs@anchor.ho.att.com

AIR Mosaic Feedback Mail

  • 1995-02-04 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 16:11:52 PST) – AIR Mosaic Feedback Mail – rchcnslt@epix.net

Re: re to hfinney

  • 1995-02-04 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 18:45:45 PST) – Re: re to hfinney – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

Re: commercial authecation

  • 1995-02-04 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 19:58:31 PST) – Re: commercial authecation – wcs@anchor.ho.att.com

Wired Institutes PGP Usage For Subscriptions….

  • 1995-02-04 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 21:09:35 PST) – Wired Institutes PGP Usage For Subscriptions…. – werewolf@io.org (Mark Terka)
    • 1995-02-04 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 03:01:39 PST) – Re: Wired Institutes PGP Usage For Subscriptions…. – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>

Re: commercial authecation

  • 1995-02-04 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 21:59:13 PST) – Re: commercial authecation – “Wei Dai” <weidai@eskimo.com>

IMPORTANT: BUG IN 68K IDEA ASSEMBLER DISTRIBUTED IN SECURE EDIT

  • 1995-02-04 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 22:11:13 PST) – IMPORTANT: BUG IN 68K IDEA ASSEMBLER DISTRIBUTED IN SECURE EDIT – tjb@acpub.duke.edu (Tom Bryce)

FIXED SEC. EDIT, SEC. EDIT SOURCE, UPGRADE PATCH

  • 1995-02-04 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 00:01:00 PST) – FIXED SEC. EDIT, SEC. EDIT SOURCE, UPGRADE PATCH – tjb@acpub.duke.edu (Tom Bryce)

  • 1995-02-04 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 02:22:46 PST) – [](/archive/1995/02/7d3693eca4254dfdc33010df126be1e00686f94726225d28e26f9e37ce35ee47) – _Anonymous \<nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu\>_

Forward: Teleco/Cabe REg. & Free speech

  • 1995-02-04 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 05:59:04 PST) – Forward: Teleco/Cabe REg. & Free speech – “Harry S. Hawk” <habs@panix.com>
    • 1995-02-04 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 15:42:16 PST) – Re: Forward: Teleco/Cabe REg. & Free speech – mikepb@freke.lerctr.org (Michael P. Brininstool)

NYC CPUNKS MEET NEXT SAT

  • 1995-02-04 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 06:26:35 PST) – NYC CPUNKS MEET NEXT SAT – mjwohler@netcom.com (Marc Wohler)

Re:

  • 1995-02-04 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 07:31:56 PST) – [Re: ](/archive/1995/02/733d8006cc9a65ccd28482ffdb2a5caa56c6c4f2d2981fa67197f341168fbea9) – _rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)_

signature validation on secure edit messages

  • 1995-02-04 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 09:05:15 PST) – signature validation on secure edit messages – tjb@acpub.duke.edu (Tom Bryce)

There is another NetCash

  • 1995-02-04 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 10:11:09 PST) – There is another NetCash – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

PGP padding scripts (again)

  • 1995-02-04 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 10:17:03 PST) – PGP padding scripts (again) – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
    • 1995-02-04 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 11:06:20 PST) – Re: PGP padding scripts (again) – Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>

Re: There is another NetCash

  • 1995-02-04 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 11:53:03 PST) – Re: There is another NetCash – rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)

finney’s perl scripts

  • 1995-02-04 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 14:12:44 PST) – finney’s perl scripts – anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com

Vinge on PKE ?

  • 1995-02-05 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 16:57:38 PST) – Vinge on PKE ? – lwp@garnet.msen.com (Lou Poppler)
    • 1995-02-05 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 17:52:44 PST) – Re: Vinge on PKE ? – Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>
      • 1995-02-05 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 18:33:47 PST) – Re: Vinge on PKE ? – Lou Poppler <lwp@garnet.msen.com>
    • 1995-02-05 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 23:00:50 PST) – Vinge on PKE ? – david.lloyd-jones@canrem.com (David Lloyd-Jones)
      • 1995-02-05 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 23:17:28 PST) – Re: Vinge on PKE ? – erc@s116.slcslip.indirect.com (Ed Carp [khijol Sysadmin])
        • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 16:16:10 PST) – RE: VINGE ON PKE ? – david.lloyd-jones@canrem.com (David Lloyd-Jones)

Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.

  • 1995-02-05 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 18:43:14 PST) – Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet. – anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com

Re: Forward: Teleco/Cabe REg. & Free speech

  • Unknown thread root
    • 1995-02-05 (Sat, 4 Feb 95 19:26:57 PST) – Re: Forward: Teleco/Cabe REg. & Free speech – “Harry S. Hawk” <habs@panix.com>

Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.

  • 1995-02-05 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 00:22:00 PST) – Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet. – lcottrell@popmail.ucsd.edu (Lance Cottrell)

Mixmaster client release

  • 1995-02-05 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 00:53:11 PST) – Mixmaster client release – lcottrell@popmail.ucsd.edu (Lance Cottrell)

The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)

  • 1995-02-05 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 02:03:31 PST) – The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6) – strick at The Yak <strick@yak.net>
    • 1995-02-05 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 11:02:38 PST) – Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6) – sdw@lig.net (Stephen D. Williams)
      • 1995-02-05 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 12:25:05 PST) – Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6) – Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
        • 1995-02-05 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 12:33:21 PST) – Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6) – sdw@lig.net (Stephen D. Williams)
          • 1995-02-05 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 13:19:33 PST) – Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6) – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
        • 1995-02-05 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 13:17:47 PST) – Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6) – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
      • 1995-02-05 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 15:10:45 PST) – Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6) – Matthew J Ghio <mg5n+@andrew.cmu.edu>
        • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 16:08:37 PST) – Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6) – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
          • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 16:29:28 PST) – Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6) – Matthew J Ghio <mg5n+@andrew.cmu.edu>
            • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 16:48:44 PST) – Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6) – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
          • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 16:45:30 PST) – Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6) – Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>

NYT on Tera and UUNet

  • 1995-02-05 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 07:05:34 PST) – NYT on Tera and UUNet – John Young <jya@pipeline.com>

Here we go again…

  • 1995-02-05 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 08:50:30 PST) – Here we go again… – Johnathan Corgan <jcorgan@aeinet.com>
    • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 21:07:50 PST) – Re: Here we go again… – Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>

No Subject

  • 1995-02-05 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 09:55:12 PST) – No Subject – Syed Yusuf <yusuf921@uidaho.edu>

BROKEN REMAILERS

  • 1995-02-05 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 10:02:38 PST) – BROKEN REMAILERS – nobody@tower.techwood.org (Anonymous)

BROKEN REMAILERS

  • 1995-02-05 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 10:03:55 PST) – BROKEN REMAILERS – Nobody@eniac.ac.siue.edu (Anonymous)

Zimmermann charges dropped?

  • 1995-02-05 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 13:00:32 PST) – Zimmermann charges dropped? – tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
    • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 21:06:23 PST) – Zimmermann charges NOT dropped – tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)

Re: Zimmermann charges dropped?

  • 1995-02-05 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 15:52:39 PST) – Re: Zimmermann charges dropped? – Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>

Re: BROKEN REMAILERS

  • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 16:28:47 PST) – Re: BROKEN REMAILERS – Alex de Joode <usura@replay.com>

Re: BROKEN REMAILERS

  • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 16:31:18 PST) – Re: BROKEN REMAILERS – lcottrell@popmail.ucsd.edu (Lance Cottrell)

“encrypt tcp connections” hacks

  • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 17:06:28 PST) – “encrypt tcp connections” hacks – strick at The Yak <strick@yak.net>
    • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 18:03:00 PST) – Re: “encrypt tcp connections” hacks – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
      • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 20:32:42 PST) – Re: “encrypt tcp connections” hacks – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
        • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 02:26:23 PST) – Re: “encrypt tcp connections” hacks – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
          • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 10:09:51 PST) – Re: “encrypt tcp connections” hacks – Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
            • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 10:30:41 PST) – Re: “encrypt tcp connections” hacks – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
              • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 19:58:14 PST) – Re: “encrypt tcp connections” hacks – Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
                • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 20:26:25 PST) – Re: “encrypt tcp connections” hacks – root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
                • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 20:55:55 PST) – Re: “encrypt tcp connections” hacks – “James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>
          • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 12:25:10 PST) – Re: “encrypt tcp connections” hacks – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
      • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 09:58:33 PST) – Re: “encrypt tcp connections” hacks – “Trool the Red Adept” <cdbunch@bansai.ucs.uoknor.edu>

Re: signature validation on secure edit messages

  • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 17:28:35 PST) – Re: signature validation on secure edit messages – joelm@eskimo.com (Joel McNamara)

Judge not…

  • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 17:48:11 PST) – Judge not… – anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
    • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 19:18:28 PST) – Re: Judge not… – Dave Horsfall <dave@esi.COM.AU>
    • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 22:58:47 PST) – Re: Judge not… – “James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>

Re: signature validation on secure edit messages

  • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 19:02:57 PST) – Re: signature validation on secure edit messages – dmandl@panix.com (David Mandl)

Re: “encrypt tcp connections” hacks

  • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 19:34:50 PST) – Re: “encrypt tcp connections” hacks – lrh@PrimeNet.Com (Dr. Lyman Hazelton)

Excerpts of signed messages

  • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 20:23:55 PST) – Excerpts of signed messages – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
    • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 02:00:36 PST) – Re: Excerpts of signed messages – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>

dna ink

  • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 20:30:56 PST) – dna ink – Dan Harmon <harmon@tenet.edu>
    • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 02:03:53 PST) – Re: dna ink – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
      • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 11:57:38 PST) – dna ink – Eric Blossom <eb@comsec.com>
    • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 09:56:05 PST) – Re: dna ink – Mark Rogaski <rogaski@phobos.lib.iup.edu>

Re: Remailer encryption module

  • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 21:35:07 PST) – Re: Remailer encryption module – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

Re: finney’s perl scripts

  • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 22:04:34 PST) – Re: finney’s perl scripts – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

New directions in anonymity (needed)

  • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 22:17:10 PST) – New directions in anonymity (needed) – Mike Ingle <MIKEINGLE@delphi.com>
    • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 00:00:52 PST) – Re: New directions in anonymity (needed) – tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
      • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 00:47:19 PST) – Re: Legal implications of one-of-a-group guilt – “L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
      • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 20:18:10 PST) – Re: New directions in anonymity (needed) – anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
    • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 00:08:52 PST) – Re: New directions in anonymity (needed) – “L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>

re finney’s perl scripts

  • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 23:01:37 PST) – re finney’s perl scripts – anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com

Creating commercial acceptability for remailers?

  • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 23:44:10 PST) – Creating commercial acceptability for remailers? – wcs@anchor.ho.att.com

Re: Zimmermann charges NOT dropped

  • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 23:50:18 PST) – Re: Zimmermann charges NOT dropped – shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)

Mixmaster supports PGP

  • 1995-02-06 (Sun, 5 Feb 95 23:53:08 PST) – Mixmaster supports PGP – lcottrell@popmail.ucsd.edu (Lance Cottrell)

Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)

  • Unknown thread root
    • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 00:04:41 PST) – Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6) – strick – henry strickland <strick@versant.com>

Remailer msgs ideath -> rebma don’t work.

  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 00:23:33 PST) – Remailer msgs ideath -> rebma don’t work. – Greg Broiles <greg@ideath.goldenbear.com>
  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 01:33:14 PST) – Re: Legal implications of one-of-a-group guilt – an448@freenet.carleton.ca (Yves Bellefeuille)

Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal

  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 03:30:23 PST) – Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal – Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Cooperation

  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 03:31:24 PST) – Cooperation – Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
    • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 03:55:41 PST) – Re: Cooperation – tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
      • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 10:14:00 PST) – Re: Cooperation – Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>

Change to the congressional contact list

  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 06:27:43 PST) – Change to the congressional contact list – Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>

List of reliable remailers

  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 06:49:53 PST) – List of reliable remailers – Raph Levien <raph@CS.Berkeley.EDU>

Re: Vinge on PKE ? (really idiot savants)

  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 07:37:21 PST) – Re: Vinge on PKE ? (really idiot savants) – Jonathan Corbet <corbet@stout.atd.ucar.edu>

Camden New Jersey

  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 07:45:16 PST) – Camden New Jersey – an158409@anon.penet.fi (beacher)
    • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 08:09:47 PST) – Re: Camden New Jersey – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>

CFP’95 Program/Registration Information (fwd)

  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 08:48:13 PST) – CFP’95 Program/Registration Information (fwd) – Michael Froomkin <MFROOMKI@umiami.ir.miami.edu>

Re: Cooperation

  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 08:51:56 PST) – Re: Cooperation – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
    • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 12:13:17 PST) – Re: Cooperation – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
      • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 12:44:12 PST) – Re: Cooperation – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
        • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 13:15:06 PST) – Re: Cooperation – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
        • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 05:22:55 PST) – Re: Cooperation – Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
          • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 08:06:21 PST) – Re: Cooperation – storm@marlin.ssnet.com (Don Melvin)

MD5 coding

  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 10:59:56 PST) – MD5 coding – philip@cs.brandeis.edu (Philip Trauring)
    • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 11:43:50 PST) – Re: MD5 coding – Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
    • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 22:37:39 PST) – Re: MD5 coding – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>

To Bundle Or Not To Bundle?

  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 11:17:09 PST) – To Bundle Or Not To Bundle? – jltocher@CCGATE.HAC.COM

Re: MD5 coding

  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 12:15:03 PST) – Re: MD5 coding – philip@cs.brandeis.edu (Philip Trauring)

RE: Firewall chips

  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 12:29:02 PST) – RE: Firewall chips – Brian D Williams <talon57@well.sf.ca.us>

Re: dna ink

  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 12:48:48 PST) – Re: dna ink – shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
    • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 13:31:30 PST) – Re: dna ink – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
      • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 19:27:53 PST) – Re: dna ink – root <root@einstein.ssz.com>

Selection key crypto protocol trial balloon

  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 14:01:26 PST) – Selection key crypto protocol trial balloon – rishab@dxm.ernet.in

Re: Cooperation

  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 14:08:37 PST) – Re: Cooperation – jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)

Re: “encrypt tcp connections” hacks

  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 14:09:54 PST) – Re: “encrypt tcp connections” hacks – Johnathan Corgan <jcorgan@aeinet.com>

RE: DNA ink

  • 1995-02-06 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 14:13:47 PST) – RE: DNA ink – Brian D Williams <talon57@well.sf.ca.us>

preliminary cypherpunks announcement

  • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 16:02:37 PST) – preliminary cypherpunks announcement – Katy Kislitzin <ktk@anemone.corp.sgi.com>

a simple explanation of DC-Net

  • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 17:23:00 PST) – a simple explanation of DC-Net – “Wei Dai” <weidai@eskimo.com>
    • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 20:02:51 PST) – Re: a simple explanation of DC-Net – Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
    • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 22:22:38 PST) – Re: a simple explanation of DC-Net – tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)

Re: alt.religion.your.operating.system.sucks

  • 1995-01-30 (Sun, 29 Jan 95 21:23:25 PST) – Re: alt.religion.your.operating.system.sucks – anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
    • 1995-01-30 (Sun, 29 Jan 95 21:55:47 PST) – Re: alt.religion.your.operating.system.sucks – Spif <c642011@cclabs.missouri.edu>
    • 1995-01-30 (Mon, 30 Jan 95 05:38:10 PST) – Re: alt.religion.your.operating.system.sucks – Name Withheld By Request <cs000rrs@selway.umt.edu>
      • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 19:13:47 PST) – Re: alt.religion.your.operating.system.sucks – Christopher E Stefan <flatline@u.washington.edu>
    • 1995-01-30 (Mon, 30 Jan 95 06:07:58 PST) – Re: alt.religion.your.operating.system.sucks – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
      • 1995-01-30 (Mon, 30 Jan 95 10:45:48 PST) – Re: alt.religion.your.operating.system.sucks – “James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>
        • 1995-01-31 (Tue, 31 Jan 95 07:50:45 PST) – Re: alt.religion.your.operating.system.sucks – Brian Beattie <beattie@PEAK.ORG>

Remailer RFC

  • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 19:17:40 PST) – Remailer RFC – Michael Handler <grendel@netaxs.com>

(dis)advantages of DC-Net vs remailers

  • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 19:28:34 PST) – (dis)advantages of DC-Net vs remailers – “Wei Dai” <weidai@eskimo.com>
    • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 20:46:27 PST) – Re: (dis)advantages of DC-Net vs remailers – “James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>

Re: dna ink

  • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 20:08:28 PST) – Re: dna ink – jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)
    • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 20:23:16 PST) – Re: dna ink – root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
      • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 04:46:44 PST) – Re: dna ink – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
        • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 11:28:01 PST) – Re: dna ink – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
          • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 12:27:55 PST) – Re: dna ink – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
    • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 21:01:19 PST) – Re: dna ink – sdw@lig.net (Stephen D. Williams)

Automatic Echo of Test Posting

  • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 20:49:57 PST) – Automatic Echo of Test Posting – usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (Usenet Administration)

Re: lwall

  • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 20:50:18 PST) – Re: lwall – MathWorks Autoresponder <usenet@mathworks.com>

Re: New directions in anonymity (needed)

  • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 21:37:24 PST) – Re: New directions in anonymity (needed) – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

Re: lwall

  • 1995-02-07 (Mon, 6 Feb 95 22:24:32 PST) – Re: lwall – Xpat Autoresponder <autoreply@xpat.postech.ac.kr>

The Rise of “Worse is Better”…

  • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 01:25:16 PST) – The Rise of “Worse is Better”… – stig@hackvan.com (Stig)
    • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 02:43:21 PST) – Re: The Rise of “Worse is Better”… – stig@hackvan.com (Stig)
    • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 07:45:14 PST) – Re: The Rise of “Worse is Better”… – jason cooper <jcooper@acs.ucalgary.ca>
      • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:48:27 PST) – Re: The Rise of “Worse is Better”… – Don Clysdale <clysdale@dragon.achilles.net>

RE: “bad” government

  • 1995-01-30 (Mon, 30 Jan 95 15:09:49 PST) – RE: “bad” government – “Richard F. Dutcher” <rfdutcher@igc.apc.org>
    • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 02:07:17 PST) – Corporate Fascism, Rand, Greens, Oh My! – tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)

Is the remailer crisis over?

  • 1995-01-31 (Mon, 30 Jan 95 23:07:28 PST) – Is the remailer crisis over? – skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
    • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 02:16:44 PST) – Re: Is the remailer crisis over? – tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
      • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 09:09:02 PST) – Re: Is the remailer crisis over? – nobody@tower.techwood.org (Anonymous)
        • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 11:14:35 PST) – Re: Is the remailer crisis over? – Mats Bergstrom <asgaard@sos.sll.se>

Re: lwall

  • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 05:13:54 PST) – Re: lwall – Usenet Autoresponder <usenet@netnet2.netnet.net>

RE: Re: lwall

  • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 05:32:28 PST) – RE: Re: lwall – rparratt@london.micrognosis.com (Richard Parratt)

Source code for Applied Cryptography

  • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 06:34:09 PST) – Source code for Applied Cryptography – lce@wwa.com (Larry E)

RE: Source code for Applied Cryptography

  • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 06:50:23 PST) – RE: Source code for Applied Cryptography – Johnathan Corgan <jcorgan@aeinet.com>

URGENT – What S.314 Would Do

  • 1995-02-07 (7 Feb 1995 14:58:36 GMT) – URGENT – What S.314 Would Do – slowdog@wookie.net (slowdog)
    • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 00:19:05 PST) – Re: URGENT – What S.314 Would Do – Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
      • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 09:57:50 PST) – Re: URGENT – What S.314 Would Do – Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>

MIME based remailing commands

  • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 08:37:19 PST) – MIME based remailing commands – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
    • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 08:49:48 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>

Re: (dis)advantages of DC-Net vs remailers

  • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 09:37:02 PST) – Re: (dis)advantages of DC-Net vs remailers – Andrew Lowenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>

Re: dna ink

  • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 09:53:15 PST) – Re: dna ink – Keith Henson <keith@filoli.com>

CIAC Bulletin F-10: HP-UX Remote Watch

  • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 09:58:40 PST) – CIAC Bulletin F-10: HP-UX Remote Watch – John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
    • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 10:41:14 PST) – Re: CIAC Bulletin F-10: HP-UX Remote Watch – Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>

testing the waters re: new crypto FTP site

  • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 10:14:44 PST) – testing the waters re: new crypto FTP site – tjb@acpub.duke.edu (Tom Bryce)

Re: preliminary cypherpunks announcement

  • Unknown thread root
    • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 10:32:33 PST) – Re: preliminary cypherpunks announcement – Katy Kislitzin <ktk@anemone.corp.sgi.com>
      • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 13:28:59 PST) – CFP, Cypherpunks, and Crypto – tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)

Re: Corporate Fascism, Rand, Greens, Oh My!

  • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 11:13:35 PST) – Re: Corporate Fascism, Rand, Greens, Oh My! – frissell@panix.com (Duncan Frissell)

Seals and Sealing Waxes

  • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 12:27:56 PST) – Seals and Sealing Waxes – tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
    • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 16:58:57 PST) – Re: Seals and Sealing Waxes – chen@intuit.com (Mark Chen)

Child Porno

  • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 13:40:58 PST) – Child Porno – Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>

Re: CFP, Cypherpunks, and Crypto

  • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 14:16:43 PST) – Re: CFP, Cypherpunks, and Crypto – Matt Blaze <mab@research.att.com>

ssl-talk@netscape.com

  • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 14:44:29 PST) – ssl-talk@netscape.com – “Kipp E.B. Hickman” <kipp@warp.mcom.com>

Zimmermann

  • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 15:00:31 PST) – Zimmermann – “Philip L. Dubois” <dubois@csn.org>
    • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 15:26:47 PST) – Re: Zimmermann – Jack Repenning <jackr@dblues.engr.sgi.com>
      • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 17:33:51 PST) – Re: Zimmermann – Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>

noiz-0.5: simple noise-emitting package

  • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 15:54:09 PST) – noiz-0.5: simple noise-emitting package – strick@techwood.org

EPIC Alert 2.02

  • 1995-02-07 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 15:55:42 PST) – EPIC Alert 2.02 – Dave_Banisar.OFFICE@epic.org

NYC CPUNKS MEET

  • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 16:16:53 PST) – NYC CPUNKS MEET – mjwohler@netcom.com (Marc Wohler)

Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)

  • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 16:18:29 PST) – Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
    • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 16:40:39 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
      • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 19:34:36 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
        • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 12:02:56 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – “James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>
          • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 22:06:51 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
            • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 22:35:58 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
              • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 06:07:31 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
              • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 12:33:43 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
    • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 20:46:01 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – Brad Huntting <huntting@glarp.com>
      • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 20:48:24 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
      • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 21:12:51 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
        • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 21:39:19 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – jpp@markv.com
          • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 11:25:17 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
          • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 12:25:23 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – “James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>
            • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 14:59:11 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – storm@marlin.ssnet.com (Don Melvin)
      • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 21:50:50 PST) – S.314, the “Pi Bill” – tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
        • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 22:41:32 PST) – Re: S.314, the “Pi Bill” – Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>

RE: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)

  • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 17:17:10 PST) – RE: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – Johnathan Corgan <jcorgan@aeinet.com>

a new way to do anonymity

  • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 17:32:30 PST) – a new way to do anonymity – “Wei Dai” <weidai@eskimo.com>
    • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 20:10:39 PST) – Re: a new way to do anonymity – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)

Re: noiz-0.5: simple noise-emitting package

  • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 17:48:48 PST) – Re: noiz-0.5: simple noise-emitting package – Matt Blaze <mab@research.att.com>

forward; e-cash

  • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 18:47:04 PST) – forward; e-cash – “Harry S. Hawk” <habs@panix.com>

!NYC Cypherpunks meeting 2/11/95!

  • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 19:24:07 PST) – !NYC Cypherpunks meeting 2/11/95! – Arsen Ray Arachelian <rarachel@photon.poly.edu>

RE: a new way to do anonymity

  • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 19:29:22 PST) – RE: a new way to do anonymity – Johnathan Corgan <jcorgan@aeinet.com>
    • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 20:23:52 PST) – RE: a new way to do anonymity – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)

Re: “encrypt tcp connections” hacks

  • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 20:07:44 PST) – Re: “encrypt tcp connections” hacks – Chris Claborne <Chris.Claborne@SanDiego.ATTGIS.COM>

Fwd: Seals and Sealing Waxes

  • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 20:59:06 PST) – Fwd: Seals and Sealing Waxes – Alan Pugh <0003701548@mcimail.com>

Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)

  • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 21:26:30 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – jpp@markv.com
    • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 09:52:02 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
      • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 10:58:57 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – jpp@markv.com

Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)

  • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 21:27:31 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>
    • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 22:47:49 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – “L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
      • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 23:24:13 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
        • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 01:46:56 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
          • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 02:03:07 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
            • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 09:03:00 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
              • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 11:02:25 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – strick@techwood.org
                • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 06:54:08 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
                  • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 07:52:27 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
                    • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 14:58:47 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
                      • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 17:01:10 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
                        • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 02:32:10 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
      • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 23:34:23 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
      • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 00:14:53 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – Anthony Ortenzi <ortenzi@interactive.net>

USPO & Digital Postage/E-Cash Project

  • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 22:35:37 PST) – USPO & Digital Postage/E-Cash Project – daleh@ix.netcom.com (Dale Harrison (AEGIS))
    • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 07:15:51 PST) – Re: USPO & Digital Postage/E-Cash Project – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>

RE: a new way to do anonymity

  • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 22:53:33 PST) – RE: a new way to do anonymity – Johnathan Corgan <jcorgan@aeinet.com>
    • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 06:20:39 PST) – RE: a new way to do anonymity – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)

Full text of S. 314

  • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 23:07:13 PST) – Full text of S. 314 – Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
    • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 00:26:37 PST) – Re: Full text of S. 314 – Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
      • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 11:28:49 PST) – Re: Full text of S. 314 – slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>

noiz … and more SKRONK

  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 00:11:19 PST) – noiz … and more SKRONK – strick@techwood.org

Congressional Phone Numbers

  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 00:41:10 PST) – Congressional Phone Numbers – Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@c2.org>

Exon in WSJ

  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 06:14:02 PST) – Exon in WSJ – frissell@panix.com (Duncan Frissell)

WSJ Article on Sen. Exon’s Legislation

  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 06:37:28 PST) – WSJ Article on Sen. Exon’s Legislation – daleh@ix.netcom.com (Dale Harrison (AEGIS))
    • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 06:59:37 PST) – Re: WSJ Article on Sen. Exon’s Legislation – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)

Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)

  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 06:42:12 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – “Brett Turcotte” <turcotte@io.com>

MBONE access needed

  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 07:20:36 PST) – MBONE access needed – perry@imsi.com (Perry E. Metzger)

Re: lwall

  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 07:38:43 PST) – Re: lwall – NIEHS Autoresponder <usenet@jeeves.niehs.nih.gov>

Email Add’s of Senators?

  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 08:02:11 PST) – Email Add’s of Senators? – Jaeson.M.Engle@josaiah.sewanee.edu (Rhys Kyraden)

Re: USPO & Digital Postage/E-Cash Project

  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 08:06:08 PST) – Re: USPO & Digital Postage/E-Cash Project – haeberli@apple.com (Martin Haeberli)

Re: Seals and Sealing Waxes

  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 09:08:22 PST) – Re: Seals and Sealing Waxes – System Operator <system@decode.com>

Re: MIME based remailing commands

  • Unknown thread root
    • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 09:20:11 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>

Re: Selection key crypto protocol trial balloon

  • Unknown thread root
    • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 09:39:16 PST) – Re: Selection key crypto protocol trial balloon – rishab@dxm.ernet.in (Rishab Aiyer Ghosh)
      • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 12:46:20 PST) – Re: Selection key crypto protocol trial balloon – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

Re: skronk

  • Unknown thread root
    • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 10:52:26 PST) – Re: skronk – strick@techwood.org
      • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 11:37:44 PST) – Re: skronk – “Kipp E.B. Hickman” <kipp@warp.mcom.com>
        • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 11:48:24 PST) – Re: skronk – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
        • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 11:55:34 PST) – Re: skronk – Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
          • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 13:09:44 PST) – Re: skronk – “Kipp E.B. Hickman” <kipp@warp.mcom.com>
            • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 20:23:40 PST) – Re: skronk – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
        • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 12:09:54 PST) – Re: skronk – cactus@seabsd.hks.net (Todd Masco)
        • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 20:14:43 PST) – Re: skronk – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
      • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 12:25:47 PST) – Re: skronk – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
      • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 10:04:03 PST) – Re: skronk – kipp@warp.mcom.com (Kipp E.B. Hickman)

Four Horsemen

  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 12:12:35 PST) – Four Horsemen – kkirksey@world.std.com (Ken Kirksey)
    • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 13:42:13 PST) – Re: Four Horsemen – tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)

Jefferson Wheel Cypher

  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 12:12:36 PST) – Jefferson Wheel Cypher – kkirksey@world.std.com (Ken Kirksey)
    • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 14:11:36 PST) – Re: Jefferson Wheel Cypher – Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>

Re: Seals and Sealing Waxes

  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 12:12:41 PST) – Re: Seals and Sealing Waxes – kkirksey@world.std.com (Ken Kirksey)

Re: MIME based remailing commands

  • Unknown thread root
    • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 12:38:30 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
      • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 20:20:48 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
      • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 12:20:29 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>

Judges-L FAQ

  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 12:44:14 PST) – Judges-L FAQ – “Craig A. Johnston” <caj@tower.techwood.org>
    • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 13:38:00 PST) – Re: Judges-L FAQ – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
    • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 13:44:12 PST) – Re: Judges-L FAQ – Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>

Wiretaps & terrorism

  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 13:31:05 PST) – Wiretaps & terrorism – Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>

Re: lwall

  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 13:42:02 PST) – Re: lwall – EFN Autoresponder <usenet@news.efn.org>

Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)

  • Unknown thread root
    • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 13:53:46 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – Carl Ellison <cme@tis.com>
      • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 21:08:42 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
      • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 06:58:53 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
        • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 15:13:35 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – “James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>

To clear this up.

  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 13:59:01 PST) – To clear this up. – “Craig A. Johnston” <caj@tower.techwood.org>

Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)

  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 14:04:36 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)

Re: Judges-L FAQ

  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 14:11:03 PST) – Re: Judges-L FAQ – Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>
    • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 17:42:41 PST) – Re: Judges-L FAQ – “James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>

RE: a new way to do anonymity

  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 14:44:03 PST) – RE: a new way to do anonymity – “Wei Dai” <weidai@eskimo.com>
    • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 15:35:55 PST) – Re: a new way to do anonymity – Matt Blaze <mab@research.att.com>

Re: MIME based remailing commands

  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 14:52:06 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – xpat@vm1.spcs.umn.edu
    • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 15:04:29 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
      • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 20:27:14 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
        • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 06:58:55 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
        • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 13:00:57 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
          • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 13:17:31 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
          • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 14:05:41 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
      • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 12:46:16 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
        • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 13:14:00 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
    • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 12:42:18 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>

Hastur CT status

  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 16:14:33 PST) – Hastur CT status – A Loose Affiliation of Millionaires and Billionaires and Babies <cactus@hks.net>
    • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 20:10:38 PST) – Re: Hastur CT status – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)

The drumbeat against anonymity continues….

  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 17:16:59 PST) – The drumbeat against anonymity continues…. – tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)

Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway…

  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 17:28:24 PST) – Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… – root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
    • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 17:44:38 PST) – Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… – Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
      • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:21:35 PST) – Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… – Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
      • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:29:57 PST) – Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… – “L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
        • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:58:03 PST) – Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… – Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
      • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:53:14 PST) – Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… – Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
      • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 07:02:48 PST) – Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
        • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 07:10:31 PST) – Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… – Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
        • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 07:59:22 PST) – Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… – slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
          • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 08:13:00 PST) – Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… – joshua geller <joshua@dee.retix.com>
            • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 15:03:44 PST) – Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
      • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 08:15:31 PST) – Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… – Greg Morgan <mac5tgm@hibbs.vcu.edu>
    • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:50:54 PST) – Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… – Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
    • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 19:14:24 PST) – Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… – Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>

Meeting Anncouncement for Sat. Feb. 11 1995 SF Bay Area Meeting

  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:19:01 PST) – Meeting Anncouncement for Sat. Feb. 11 1995 SF Bay Area Meeting – hugh@ecotone.toad.com (Hugh Daniel)

Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)

  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:21:01 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – dmandl@panix.com (David Mandl)
    • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 19:51:32 PST) – Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) – eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)

Re: Judges-L FAQ

  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:45:17 PST) – Re: Judges-L FAQ – jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)

Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway…

  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:54:49 PST) – Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… – droelke@spirit.aud.alcatel.com (Daniel R. Oelke)

Vernor Vinge info…

  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 19:20:53 PST) – Vernor Vinge info… – jmueller@gac.edu

Re: Judges-L FAQ

  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 19:25:52 PST) – Re: Judges-L FAQ – Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>

S314 and potential hell-raising

  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 19:38:08 PST) – S314 and potential hell-raising – silly@beat.ugcs.caltech.edu ((me))
    • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 22:05:41 PST) – Re: S314 and potential hell-raising – skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
      • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 22:17:25 PST) – Re: S314 and potential hell-raising – root <root@einstein.ssz.com>

Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway…

  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 19:40:30 PST) – Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… – jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)

Da Judge-L FAQ – We are not Amused

  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 19:58:00 PST) – Da Judge-L FAQ – We are not Amused – tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
    • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 23:23:08 PST) – Re: Da Judge-L FAQ – We are not Amused – joshua geller <alkahest!joshua@dee.retix.com>
      • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 21:15:50 PST) – Re: Da Judge-L FAQ – We are not Amused – peterb@telerama.lm.com (Peter Berger)

Re: S314 and potential hell-raising

  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 20:10:17 PST) – Re: S314 and potential hell-raising – Jaeson.M.Engle@josaiah.sewanee.edu (Rhys Kyraden)
    • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 22:05:36 PST) – Re: S314 and potential hell-raising – skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
      • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 22:30:35 PST) – Re: S314 and potential hell-raising – slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
    • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 23:21:56 PST) – Re: S314 and potential hell-raising – joshua geller <alkahest!joshua@dee.retix.com>
      • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 06:09:13 PST) – Re: S314 and potential hell-raising – slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
    • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 09:14:07 PST) – Re: S314 and potential hell-raising – Dave Banisar <tc@phantom.com>

S. 314 and existing situation

  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 20:38:25 PST) – S. 314 and existing situation – “Richard F. Dutcher” <rfdutcher@igc.apc.org>
    • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 09:55:25 PST) – Re: S. 314 and existing situation – Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
      • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 11:01:54 PST) – Re: S. 314 and existing situation – slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
        • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 14:59:09 PST) – Re: S. 314 and existing situation – storm@marlin.ssnet.com (Don Melvin)

Re: Da Judge-L FAQ – We are not Amused

  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 20:44:47 PST) – Re: Da Judge-L FAQ – We are not Amused – Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>

Re: The drumbeat against anonymity continues….

  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 21:19:02 PST) – Re: The drumbeat against anonymity continues…. – ethridge@netcom.com (Allen B. Ethridge)
    • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 13:59:19 PST) – Re: The drumbeat against anonymity (Cellphone security?) – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>

Coming to a newsserver near you alt.defeat.s314

  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 22:28:07 PST) – Coming to a newsserver near you alt.defeat.s314 – nobody@tower.techwood.org (Name Withheld)
    • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 13:02:58 PST) – Re: Coming to a newsserver near you alt.defeat.s314 – Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>

Re: S314 and potential hell-raising

  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 22:35:05 PST) – Re: S314 and potential hell-raising – Jaeson.M.Engle@josaiah.sewanee.edu (Rhys Kyraden)

Re: MIME based remailing commands

  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 22:35:18 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – lcottrell@popmail.ucsd.edu (Lance Cottrell)
    • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 09:10:03 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

NSO Challenge 95 Nr. 1

  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 23:38:21 PST) – NSO Challenge 95 Nr. 1 – Network Security Observations <NSO@delphi.com>

Re: The drumbeat against anonymity continues….

  • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 02:12:00 PST) – Re: The drumbeat against anonymity continues…. – rparratt@london.micrognosis.com (Richard Parratt)

Crusade’s End

  • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 04:03:10 PST) – Crusade’s End – Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal

  • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 04:03:10 PST) – Frothing remailers – an immodest proposal – Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

re: Remailer Encryption Module

  • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 04:03:19 PST) – re: Remailer Encryption Module – Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

IQ & such

  • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 04:03:20 PST) – IQ & such – Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Lucky primes–third time’s the charm?

  • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 04:03:49 PST) – Lucky primes–third time’s the charm? – Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
    • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 08:41:47 PST) – Re: Lucky primes–third time’s the charm? – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.

  • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 04:05:18 PST) – Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet. – Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Threat models. [was: Why encrypt intra-remailernet]

  • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 04:09:32 PST) – Threat models. [was: Why encrypt intra-remailernet] – Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Mixmaster + T1

  • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 04:11:02 PST) – Mixmaster + T1 – Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>

Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS?

  • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 05:31:27 PST) – Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS? – erc@s116.slcslip.indirect.com (Ed Carp [khijol Sysadmin])
    • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 05:48:21 PST) – Re: Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS? – root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
      • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 06:02:54 PST) – Re: Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS? – erc@s116.slcslip.indirect.com (Ed Carp [khijol Sysadmin])
        • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 06:47:05 PST) – Re: Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS? – Alan Barrett <barrett@daisy.ee.und.ac.za>
    • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 08:40:50 PST) – Re: Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS? – Greg Morgan <mac5tgm@hibbs.vcu.edu>

Re: Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS?

  • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 07:37:05 PST) – Re: Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS? – pdlamb@iquest.com (Patrick Lamb)

Re: Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS?

  • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 07:58:30 PST) – Re: Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS? – Philippe Nave <pdn@drmail.dr.att.com>

Senate Version of HR666 (fwd)

  • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 08:49:37 PST) – Senate Version of HR666 (fwd) – Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>

My pgp emacs code in ftp://ftp.markv.com/pub/jpp/pgpelisp/*

  • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 09:33:50 PST) – My pgp emacs code in ftp://ftp.markv.com/pub/jpp/pgpelisp/* – jpp@markv.com

NYT on HR666

  • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 10:02:37 PST) – NYT on HR666 – John Young <jya@pipeline.com>

Re: skronk

  • Unknown thread root
    • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 10:39:42 PST) – Re: skronk – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>

PEM

  • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 11:11:25 PST) – PEM – Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>

Re: Remailer Encryption Module

  • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 11:44:32 PST) – Re: Remailer Encryption Module – cactus@seabsd.hks.net (A Loose Affiliation of Millionaires and Billionaires and Babies)
  • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 14:17:09 PST) – LESM – Link Encrypted Session Manager – “Wei Dai” <weidai@eskimo.com>

Wed 15 Feb, 730pm: BayFF’s first monthly Bay Area EFF meeting

  • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 15:56:12 PST) – Wed 15 Feb, 730pm: BayFF’s first monthly Bay Area EFF meeting – gnu

S.314 on Web

  • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 16:23:46 PST) – S.314 on Web – Richard Martin ( frodo ) <g4frodo@cdf.toronto.edu>

Key management in Hastur

  • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 16:57:51 PST) – Key management in Hastur – A Loose Affiliation of Millionaires and Billionaires and Babies <cactus@hks.net>

Re: Wed 15 Feb, 730pm: BayFF’s first monthly Bay Area EFF meeting

  • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 17:03:59 PST) – Re: Wed 15 Feb, 730pm: BayFF’s first monthly Bay Area EFF meeting – Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>

No Subject

  • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 17:25:31 PST) – No Subject – jltocher@CCGATE.HAC.COM

So, what’s it all about?

  • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 17:27:21 PST) – So, what’s it all about? – “Eric Merth” <emerth@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca>
    • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 17:52:12 PST) – Re: So, what’s it all about? – joshua geller <joshua@dee.retix.com>
      • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 12:43:17 PST) – Re: So, what’s it all about? – abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)
    • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 17:58:22 PST) – Re: So, what’s it all about? – Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>

RE: a new way to do anonymity

  • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 17:50:02 PST) – RE: a new way to do anonymity – “Wei Dai” <weidai@eskimo.com>

RE: a new way to do anonymity

  • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 17:52:22 PST) – RE: a new way to do anonymity – “Wei Dai” <weidai@eskimo.com>

Re: web pages sucking secrets from your hard drive

  • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 18:43:40 PST) – Re: web pages sucking secrets from your hard drive – Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>
  • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 18:43:52 PST) – LESM – Link Encrypted Session Manager (3rd try) – “Wei Dai” <weidai@eskimo.com>

RE: a new way to do anonymity

  • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 18:48:28 PST) – RE: a new way to do anonymity – jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)
  • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 19:58:32 PST) – Re: LESM – Link Encrypted Session Manager (3rd try) – cactus@seabsd.hks.net (A Loose Affiliation of Millionaires and Billionaires and Babies)

Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway…

  • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 21:07:18 PST) – Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… – <dshayer@netcom.com> (David Shayer)
    • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 22:28:29 PST) – The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.) – Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
      • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 04:55:05 PST) – Re: The question is moot: – wfgodot@iquest.com (Michael Pierson)
      • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 05:05:09 PST) – Re: The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.) – Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>
        • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 10:23:14 PST) – Re: The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.) – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
      • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 06:52:59 PST) – Not moot? [Was Re: The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.)] – Michael Froomkin <MFROOMKI@umiami.ir.miami.edu>
      • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 11:08:17 PST) – Re: The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.) – Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>

Re: MIME based remailing commands

  • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 22:57:19 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – lcottrell@popmail.ucsd.edu (Lance Cottrell)
    • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 08:40:21 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
      • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 09:37:33 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – sameer <sameer@c2.org>

(fwd) OREGON HOUSE BILL 2319 – Outlaw Anoniminty??

  • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 23:02:22 PST) – (fwd) OREGON HOUSE BILL 2319 – Outlaw Anoniminty?? – skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)

Labour and capital in a post-industrial economy

  • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 23:09:19 PST) – Labour and capital in a post-industrial economy – rishab@dxm.ernet.in

Re: Selection key crypto protocol trial balloon

  • Unknown thread root
    • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 23:09:20 PST) – Re: Selection key crypto protocol trial balloon – rishab@dxm.ernet.in (Rishab Aiyer Ghosh)

Re: Selection key crypto protocol trial balloon

  • 1995-02-10 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 23:12:39 PST) – Re: Selection key crypto protocol trial balloon – rishab@dxm.ernet.in

stupid legislation in Oregon

  • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 00:25:51 PST) – stupid legislation in Oregon – Greg Broiles <greg@ideath.goldenbear.com>

Delphi and Encryption??

  • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 04:19:46 PST) – Delphi and Encryption?? – “Harry S. Hawk” <habs@panix.com>

Indian Supreme Court ends state control of the airwaves

  • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 06:54:56 PST) – Indian Supreme Court ends state control of the airwaves – rishab@dxm.ernet.in

GSM and cellular crypto

  • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 06:56:02 PST) – GSM and cellular crypto – rishab@dxm.ernet.in

a draft petition against S.314

  • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 06:56:08 PST) – a draft petition against S.314 – slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>

HR830 – Anyone tracking this?

  • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 08:34:32 PST) – HR830 – Anyone tracking this? – mgh5868@ultb.isc.rit.edu (M.G. Hunsberger)

Global Filesystem Guild

  • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 09:22:43 PST) – Global Filesystem Guild – lethin@ai.mit.edu (Rich Lethin)
    • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 10:36:41 PST) – Re: Global Filesystem Guild – Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>

PSI Gulps Pipeline

  • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 09:43:36 PST) – PSI Gulps Pipeline – John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
    • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 10:16:28 PST) – Bernstein! Where are YOU! – Peter F Cassidy <pcassidy@world.std.com>
      • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 10:22:33 PST) – Re: Bernstein! Where are YOU! – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
      • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 11:48:45 PST) – Re: Bernstein! Where are YOU! – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>

http://www.vocaltec.com/gti.html

  • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 09:58:29 PST) – http://www.vocaltec.com/gti.html – Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>

why pgp sucks

  • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 11:03:28 PST) – why pgp sucks – Eric Hollander <hh@xcf.Berkeley.EDU>
    • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 11:48:38 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
      • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 11:58:46 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
        • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 12:32:05 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
          • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 12:36:40 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
        • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 12:48:05 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – Greg Morgan <mac5tgm@hibbs.vcu.edu>
          • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 13:10:58 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
            • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 13:19:27 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
              • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 13:36:08 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
                • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 13:42:13 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
            • 1995-02-11 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 18:08:13 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – “James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>
          • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 14:31:27 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
            • 1995-02-11 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 16:29:58 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
              • 1995-02-11 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 17:11:41 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
                • 1995-02-11 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 19:16:52 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
              • 1995-02-11 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 19:10:18 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
                • 1995-02-11 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 19:21:16 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
                  • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 05:31:40 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
    • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 12:27:59 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
    • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 12:59:12 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
      • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 15:03:31 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – Erich von Hollander <erich@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>
    • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 14:29:15 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>

Re: HR830 – Anyone tracking this?

  • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 11:39:10 PST) – Re: HR830 – Anyone tracking this? – hendrix@acs.bu.edu

Re: West (was:HR830 – Anyone tracking this?)

  • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 12:42:13 PST) – Re: West (was:HR830 – Anyone tracking this?) – xpat@vm1.spcs.umn.edu
    • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 02:49:54 PST) – Re: West (just a minute) – craig@passport.ca (Craig Hubley)

Re: MIME based remailing commands

  • Unknown thread root
    • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 13:00:01 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>
      • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 12:33:25 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>

law vs technology

  • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 13:33:34 PST) – law vs technology – “Wei Dai” <weidai@eskimo.com>
    • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 14:51:36 PST) – Re: law vs technology – “L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
      • 1995-02-12 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 17:56:25 PST) – Re: law vs technology – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>

Re: Bernstein

  • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 13:44:31 PST) – Re: Bernstein – rishab@dxm.ernet.in

Laws, Feds, & the Internet

  • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 14:10:42 PST) – Laws, Feds, & the Internet – “Richard F. Dutcher” <rfdutcher@igc.apc.org>
    • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 15:22:12 PST) – Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet – Dave Harvey <warrior@infinet.com>

why pgp sucks

  • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 15:54:49 PST) – why pgp sucks – Greg Broiles <greg@ideath.goldenbear.com>

Re: So, what’s it all about?

  • 1995-02-11 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 17:02:53 PST) – Re: So, what’s it all about? – Network Security Observations <NSO@delphi.com>

Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet

  • 1995-02-11 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 20:02:39 PST) – Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet – “Richard F. Dutcher” <rfdutcher@igc.apc.org>
    • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 13:41:12 PST) – Re: UMich student arrested for rape story – “L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>

Re: MIME based remailing commands

  • 1995-02-11 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 21:21:24 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>

Re: Bernstein

  • 1995-02-11 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 21:38:27 PST) – Re: Bernstein – Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
    • 1995-02-11 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 21:47:10 PST) – Re: Bernstein – Peter F Cassidy <pcassidy@world.std.com>
    • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 03:16:37 PST) – Re: Bernstein – Alan Barrett <barrett@daisy.ee.und.ac.za>

Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet

  • 1995-02-11 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 22:44:16 PST) – Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet – dls@mcs.com (David Sallach)
    • 1995-02-14 (Tue, 14 Feb 95 01:02:39 PST) – Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet – abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)

new book pre announcement

  • 1995-02-11 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 23:20:30 PST) – new book pre announcement – Network Security Observations <NSO@delphi.com>

Re: why pgp sucks

  • 1995-02-11 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 23:27:57 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – alt@iquest.net (Al Thompson)
    • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 09:10:27 PST) – Re: why pgp sucks – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet

  • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 01:39:54 PST) – Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet – “Richard F. Dutcher” <rfdutcher@igc.apc.org>

automatic reply to test posting (lwall)

  • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 03:46:02 PST) – automatic reply to test posting (lwall) – news@visionware.co.uk (Visionware News)

Privacy vs. Ubiquitous Video: NetCam; Wearable WebCam, etc

  • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 05:38:43 PST) – Privacy vs. Ubiquitous Video: NetCam; Wearable WebCam, etc – rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)

NYT on Cybertheft and Sex Writer

  • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 06:36:15 PST) – NYT on Cybertheft and Sex Writer – John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
    • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 13:47:32 PST) – Re: NYT on Cybertheft and Sex Writer – “L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>

Four Horsemen of the Infopocalypse?

  • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 07:41:00 PST) – Four Horsemen of the Infopocalypse? – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>

Re: Not necessarily crypt

  • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 07:48:51 PST) – Re: Not necessarily crypt – lee.noon@mgmtsys.com (Lee Noon)

Forwarded mail….

  • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 08:05:24 PST) – Forwarded mail…. – Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>

Re: Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet

  • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 11:12:23 PST) – Re: Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet – jtender@telerama.lm.com (John Tender)

Re: Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet

  • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 11:12:33 PST) – Re: Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet – jtender@telerama.lm.com (John Tender)

“Being Digital” spinde

  • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 13:49:58 PST) – “Being Digital” spinde – “Rick H. Wesson” <wessorh@ar.com>

Does PGP scale well?

  • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 13:53:51 PST) – Does PGP scale well? – A5113643667@attpls.net (Tom Jones)
    • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 14:38:00 PST) – Re: Does PGP scale well? – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
      • 1995-02-12 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 17:06:32 PST) – Re: Does PGP scale well? – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
        • 1995-02-12 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 19:18:29 PST) – Re: Does PGP scale well? – mccoy@io.com (Jim McCoy)
        • 1995-02-12 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 22:16:29 PST) – Re: Does PGP scale well? – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>

Re: Does PGP scale well?

  • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 14:26:05 PST) – Re: Does PGP scale well? – jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)

Secure Drive ver. & loc. ?

  • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 15:26:37 PST) – Secure Drive ver. & loc. ? – “Gary Jeffers” <CCGARY@MIZZOU1.missouri.edu>

Feb 15th Meeting About PGP

  • 1995-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 15:43:45 PST) – Feb 15th Meeting About PGP – Andre Bacard <abacard@well.sf.ca.us>

TEMPEST Paper by Former Civilian (2/2)

  • 1995-02-12 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 16:37:02 PST) – TEMPEST Paper by Former Civilian (2/2) – nobody@nately.UCSD.EDU (Anonymous)

TEMPEST Paper by Former Civilian (1/2)

  • 1995-02-12 (Sat, 11 Feb 95 16:57:12 PST) – TEMPEST Paper by Former Civilian (1/2) – nobody@nately.UCSD.EDU (Anonymous)

Fwd: Re: West (just a minute)

  • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 00:20:15 PST) – Fwd: Re: West (just a minute) – Alan Pugh <0003701548@mcimail.com>

Re: UMich student arrested for rape story

  • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 02:25:38 PST) – Re: UMich student arrested for rape story – “Richard F. Dutcher” <rfdutcher@igc.apc.org>
    • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 15:45:24 PST) – Re: UMich student arrested for rape story – “L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
      • 1995-02-13 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 23:24:08 PST) – Re: UMich student arrested for rape story – roy@cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)

the problem that destroyed PGP

  • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 02:50:41 PST) – the problem that destroyed PGP – peace@BIX.com
    • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 06:50:56 PST) – Re: the problem that destroyed PGP – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
    • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 09:25:57 PST) – Re: the problem that destroyed PGP – Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
      • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 09:57:47 PST) – Re: the problem that destroyed PGP – “W. Kinney” <kinney@bogart.Colorado.EDU>
        • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 10:03:08 PST) – Re: the problem that destroyed PGP – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
          • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 10:10:30 PST) – Re: the problem that destroyed PGP – “W. Kinney” <kinney@bogart.Colorado.EDU>
        • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 10:20:57 PST) – Re: the problem that destroyed PGP – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
          • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 11:33:39 PST) – Re: the problem that destroyed PGP – “W. Kinney” <kinney@bogart.Colorado.EDU>

Q: ref. for DNA used to solve math. network prob. (fwd)

  • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 08:27:13 PST) – Q: ref. for DNA used to solve math. network prob. (fwd) – root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
    • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 12:55:43 PST) – Re: Q: ref. for DNA used to solve math. network prob. (fwd) – cjl <cjl@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu>

Privacy digest an all

  • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 10:40:09 PST) – Privacy digest an all – Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>

Design my protocol

  • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 11:19:25 PST) – Design my protocol – shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)

Involve Telcos in activism?

  • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 13:23:03 PST) – Involve Telcos in activism? – rishab@dxm.ernet.in

Clinton’s No Warrant decree, and insulting dogs

  • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 13:23:49 PST) – Clinton’s No Warrant decree, and insulting dogs – rishab@dxm.ernet.in

Clinton’s No Warrant decree, and insulting dogs

  • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 15:07:04 PST) – Clinton’s No Warrant decree, and insulting dogs – John Young <jya@pipeline.com>

Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions

  • 1995-02-12 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 15:39:37 PST) – Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions – schneier@chinet.chinet.com
    • 1995-02-13 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 16:12:48 PST) – Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions – Zachary <zachary@pentagon.io.com>
    • 1995-02-13 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 17:45:56 PST) – Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
    • 1995-02-13 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 18:19:13 PST) – Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions – mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
      • 1995-02-13 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 18:31:17 PST) – The NSA (Was Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions ) – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
        • 1995-02-13 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 21:56:03 PST) – Re: The NSA (Was Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions ) – Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
          • 1995-02-13 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 22:09:52 PST) – Re: The NSA (Was Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions ) – Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
            • 1995-02-13 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 23:21:41 PST) – Re: Our Ignorance of Govt. Capabilities – “L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
              • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 04:56:41 PST) – Archives? – Jason Burrell <jburrell@crl.com>
            • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 00:12:59 PST) – Re: Does Anyone Even Read This Stuff ? (was Re: The NSA) – “L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
              • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 01:54:20 PST) – Is Cyberspace Rich Enough? – tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
        • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 20:04:16 PST) – The NSA (Was Re: Factorin – david.lloyd-jones@canrem.com (David Lloyd-Jones)
    • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 09:52:55 PST) – Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>

Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions

  • 1995-02-13 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 16:53:30 PST) – Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions – jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)
    • 1995-02-13 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 17:13:08 PST) – Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions – “James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>
    • 1995-02-13 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 17:17:01 PST) – Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions – Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>

Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions

  • 1995-02-13 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 17:09:06 PST) – Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions – “James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>
    • 1995-02-13 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 17:21:31 PST) – Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>

Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions

  • 1995-02-13 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 17:26:36 PST) – Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions – jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)

Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions

  • 1995-02-13 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 17:33:06 PST) – Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions – doug@OpenMind.com (Doug Cutrell)

bill alert…

  • 1995-02-13 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 21:22:34 PST) – bill alert… – Lile Elam <lile@art.net>
    • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 04:38:53 PST) – Re: bill alert… – root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
      • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 08:34:28 PST) – Re: bill alert… – roy@cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
        • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 13:58:18 PST) – Re: bill alert… – root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
    • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 10:14:21 PST) – Re: bill alert… – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>

standards…

  • 1995-02-13 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 23:17:00 PST) – standards… – M00012@kanga.stcloud.msus.edu

Re: UMich student arrested for rape story

  • 1995-02-13 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 23:20:24 PST) – Re: UMich student arrested for rape story – “Richard F. Dutcher” <rfdutcher@igc.apc.org>
    • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 06:30:54 PST) – Re: UMich student arrested for rape story – “James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>
      • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 06:51:10 PST) – Re: UMich student arrested for rape story – syshtg@gsusgi2.gsu.edu (Tom Gillman)

The NSA (Was Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions )

  • 1995-02-13 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 23:32:57 PST) – The NSA (Was Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions ) – mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)

Re: Our Ignorance….

  • 1995-02-13 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 23:41:00 PST) – Re: Our Ignorance…. – M00012@kanga.stcloud.msus.edu

Re: Q: ref. for DNA used to solve math. network prob. (fwd)

  • 1995-02-13 (Sun, 12 Feb 95 23:49:24 PST) – Re: Q: ref. for DNA used to solve math. network prob. (fwd) – cactus@seabsd.hks.net (A Loose Affiliation of Millionaires and Billionaires and Babies)

Re: standards…

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 00:22:11 PST) – Re: standards… – cactus@seabsd.hks.net (A Loose Affiliation of Millionaires and Billionaires and Babies)
    • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 05:23:43 PST) – Re: standards… – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>

Re: The NSA (Was Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions )

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 00:31:05 PST) – Re: The NSA (Was Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions ) – aegis@netcom.com (Dale Harrison)

Automatic reply to your test message (lwall)

  • Unknown thread root
    • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 00:59:18 PST) – Automatic reply to your test message (lwall) – News auto-reply daemon <news@lucy.ee.und.ac.za>

you are invited…

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 01:00:13 PST) – you are invited… – Lile Elam <lile@art.net>

Re: MIME based remailing commands

  • Unknown thread root
    • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 03:26:23 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>
      • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 18:28:51 PST) – Re: MIME based remailing commands – Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>

Re: The NSA (Was Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions )

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 05:42:43 PST) – Re: The NSA (Was Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions ) – rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)

List of reliable remailers

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 06:49:51 PST) – List of reliable remailers – Raph Levien <raph@CS.Berkeley.EDU>

Re: Is Cyberspace Rich Enough?

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 11:10:02 PST) – Re: Is Cyberspace Rich Enough? – “Wei Dai” <weidai@eskimo.com>

RE: Is Cyberspace Rich Enough?

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 11:12:24 PST) – RE: Is Cyberspace Rich Enough? – Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>

Fun with numbers: Payment Switches

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 11:26:14 PST) – Fun with numbers: Payment Switches – rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)

WSJ article on Internet Telephony

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 11:48:03 PST) – WSJ article on Internet Telephony – usviszpz@ibmmail.com
    • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 21:11:56 PST) – Re: WSJ article on Internet Telephony – erc@s116.slcslip.indirect.com (Ed Carp [khijol Sysadmin])

CDT POLICY POST No.2 – X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 12:43:06 PST) – CDT POLICY POST No.2 – X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS – gnu
    • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 15:00:08 PST) – CDT POLICY POST No.2 – X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS – m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
      • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 18:07:49 PST) – Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 – X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS – Greg Morgan <mac5tgm@hibbs.vcu.edu>
    • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 16:24:50 PST) – Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 – X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS – Jack Repenning <jackr@dblues.engr.sgi.com>
    • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 17:12:35 PST) – Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 – X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS – “L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
      • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 17:31:07 PST) – Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 – X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS – Jim Gillogly <jim@rand.org>
        • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 17:48:00 PST) – Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 – X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS – Jim Gillogly <jim@rand.org>

Re: standards…

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 12:46:28 PST) – Re: standards… – wcs@anchor.ho.att.com

Re: Is Cyberspace Rich Enough?

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 13:07:01 PST) – Re: Is Cyberspace Rich Enough? – “Wei Dai” <weidai@eskimo.com>
    • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 14:22:33 PST) – Re: Is Cyberspace Rich Enough? – tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)

perry@imsi.comRe: Does PGP scale well?

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 13:14:18 PST) – perry@imsi.comRe: Does PGP scale well? – wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
    • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 14:50:01 PST) – Re: perry@imsi.comRe: Does PGP scale well? – “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>

Re: TEMPEST Paper by Former Civilian (1/2)

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 13:54:28 PST) – Re: TEMPEST Paper by Former Civilian (1/2) – wcs@anchor.ho.att.com

EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 13:57:36 PST) – EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN – “Dave Banisar” <banisar@epic.org>
    • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 15:56:21 PST) – Re: EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN – Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
      • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 17:53:17 PST) – Re: EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN – “James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>
      • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 18:18:30 PST) – Re: EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
      • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 18:57:54 PST) – Re: EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN – Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
        • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 19:32:40 PST) – Re: EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN – slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>

Re: The NSA (Was Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions )

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 13:59:27 PST) – Re: The NSA (Was Re: Factoring – State of the Art and Predictions ) – anonymous-remailer@xs4all.nl (Name withheld on request)
    • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 19:35:13 PST) – Re: The NSA – werewolf@io.org (Mark Terka)

Archives

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 13:59:42 PST) – Archives – cactus@seabsd.hks.net (A Loose Affiliation of Millionaires and Billionaires and Babies)

Re: bill alert…

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 13:59:56 PST) – Re: bill alert… – wcs@anchor.ho.att.com

CNN (fwd) Communications (In)Decency Act?

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 14:42:02 PST) – CNN (fwd) Communications (In)Decency Act? – Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>

No Subject

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 15:21:09 PST) – No Subject – Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
    • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 16:40:57 PST) – Re: your mail – “W. Kinney” <kinney@bogart.Colorado.EDU>

Re: lwall

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 15:37:56 PST) – Re: lwall – (Bull Worldwide AutoResponder) <UseNet@news.bull.com>

EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 15:39:10 PST) – EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN – Connie Sadler <SADLER_C@HOSP.STANFORD.EDU>

Ignore Test

  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 15:55:31 PST) – Ignore Test – mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)

What is the power of the FIPS

  • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 16:12:14 PST) – What is the power of the FIPS – Peter F Cassidy <pcassidy@world.std.com>
    • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 17:18:00 PST) – Re: What is the power of the FIPS – Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>

Excel 5 Encryption

  • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 16:19:24 PST) – Excel 5 Encryption – bwern@jax.jaxnet.com (Ben Wern)
    • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 17:11:09 PST) – Re: Excel 5 Encryption – Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>

Re: What is the power of the FIPS

  • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 16:31:45 PST) – Re: What is the power of the FIPS – rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)

French Mystics, Martin Gardner, and Transcendentality

  • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 17:36:40 PST) – French Mystics, Martin Gardner, and Transcendentality – mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)

Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 – X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS

  • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 18:53:11 PST) – Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 – X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS – wcs@anchor.ho.att.com

Re: What is the power of the FIPS

  • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 19:09:06 PST) – Re: What is the power of the FIPS – wcs@anchor.ho.att.com

ref on crypto formalism

  • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 19:11:24 PST) – ref on crypto formalism – Pierre Uszynski <pierre@shell.portal.com>
    • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 20:44:56 PST) – Re: ref on crypto formalism – “L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>

Zimmerphone, IPhone, NetPhone, Maven…

  • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 19:11:53 PST) – Zimmerphone, IPhone, NetPhone, Maven… – Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>

(Fwd) Returned mail

  • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 19:21:29 PST) – (Fwd) Returned mail – “Richard F. Dutcher” <rfdutcher@igc.apc.org>

Distributed Key Service for PGP (was: why pgp sucks)

  • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 19:42:42 PST) – Distributed Key Service for PGP (was: why pgp sucks) – wcs@anchor.ho.att.com

Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 – X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS

  • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 21:17:41 PST) – Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 – X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS – “Richard F. Dutcher” <rfdutcher@igc.apc.org>

Re: Is Cyberspace Rich Enough?

  • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 21:17:47 PST) – Re: Is Cyberspace Rich Enough? – “Richard F. Dutcher” <rfdutcher@igc.apc.org>

Re: EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN

  • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 21:33:13 PST) – Re: EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN – skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)

Internationalism no panacea

  • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 22:41:38 PST) – Internationalism no panacea – Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

Cypher_punks standards, again.

  • 1995-02-14 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 22:45:28 PST) – Cypher_punks standards, again. – M00012@kanga.stcloud.msus.edu

————————————————————

Return to 1995

Return to Cypherpunks Mailing List Archive